How does Paver make this extract (p.148-149) frightening? Essay

Paver uses many techniques to make this extract frightening. It is when Jack had just got lost but manages to find his trend back to his cabin. He has already encountered a spook and read about local folklore about the ghost and has a nonher experience with the ghost. Paver uses techniques such as punctuation for effect, short disapprobations and mystery and she commonly shows lots of circumstance but r arely tells which means you dirty dognot be sure till you read it.Paver uses many ways to fix fright for the reader, for example punctuation for effect. Paver says, a black tide drowning (p.149). The ellipsis allows the reader the time to piss an image and then to understand the terror. Also, a tide is generally blue or clear, similar to the sea, which seems normal and calm whereas this is black, dark and menacing, almost like Dark Matter. It reinforces that thither is nothing normal about this place, for example, when Paver says, murkiness had darkened the blotchy stains to black.When Paver says drowning, it gives the idea that thither is some dark controlling ghost that can drown a wave. It is peculiarly menacing because a black tide gives the reader the idea that it is omnipotent and almost has an agenda. The fact that the ghost can drown this tide frightens the reader. The ellipsis creates fright because it is a bring out in what Jack is saying so is there a problem, has Jack seen something and the ellipsis creates the time to conceptualize and imaging. The knowledge of the power of this ghost is especially frightening for the reader.Paver also uses many short sentences to create, build and hold open fright. For example Paver says, I saw nothing. (p.148). This shows that not all Jacks senses are working as he refers to the idea that he could see it and memorise it but then he could only hear it. This creates fright because it is confusing and you dont often hear things but not be able-bodied to see them. This also creates fright because you t hink there is something there but you cannot be sure that there is until it is read. By saying, nothing it gives the idea that Jack is lonely but not alone which again makes you unsealed whether the ghost is actually there which in turn creates fright.By being a short sentence it makes the reader feel like completing a sentence is almost a privilege and that it could be Jacks last sentence he ever says. Paver also adds Clink. Clink. (p.148) this creates fright for the reader because there are other repetitions of the excogitate clink in the book, furthermore, by being just one word long, it is as if that is the only thing that Jack can hear going on around him. Paver carries on and finishes the phrase as, Clink. Clink. Coming closer. It is all alliteration and if you imagine that in your head it is rhythmic and sounds frightening as if thats all Jack can think about. Short sentences create fright because they are terse and increase tension in a menacing scene.Paver finally create s fright by using a lot of mystery to increase uncertainty I the readers mind. Firstly, Paver says, patter of paws which is showing not telling and therefore makes the reader feel like they have the ability to assume Jacks talking about dogs but because of all the uncertainty prior in the book the reader cannot be sure. It reinforces the idea that something could be there but was it a dog or a ghost which makes it particularly frightening for the reader. Paver also adds, it took a moment to recognise myself. This creates anxiety for the reader because there is no mirror around Jack that he has mentioned and what did Jack recognise in himself. Did Jack recognise something emotional kinda than physical about himself? What did Jack do in the moments after he recognised himself? This creates fright because you are alone unsure to the situation.In conclusion, Pavers use of mystery is particularly frightening because even though you are the reader, you are almost fully unaware to the si tuation and frightened by the facts that you dont know.